<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jonas Bohlin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jonasbohlin.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jonasbohlin.net</link>
	<description>Interaction Design and other Adventures in the Cloud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:57:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s fade-in is what you want by Ellie</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/12/03/googles-fade-in-is-what-you-want/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 22:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=280#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I am sorry to say, but Google is hemorrhaging users because of the fade. Long year users know exactly what they want and they want it fast - be it gmail, images, video, pages from their home country etc. We want to make the click at once and not wait. It all takes longer now. 

What about the users that use touch screens? What about the delay while waiting to load? Especially for people with slower Internet, Google is really killing it for them. The company has a User Experience department, why don&#039;t they listen to the users? 

For a search I would usually hit my homepage and without even looking I would immediately start typing, enter and there I am. Now I&#039;m typing alright, but I find the search field catching on mid first or second keyword. It&#039;s extremely annoying. I am hard pressed to find workarounds since Google ignores the wishes of its users and refuses to provide a disable option. If no workarounds work to my satisfaction I am sorry to say I will have to change my search engine for the first time in nearly a decade. How sad...

If it ain&#039;t broke, don&#039;t fix it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sorry to say, but Google is hemorrhaging users because of the fade. Long year users know exactly what they want and they want it fast &#8211; be it gmail, images, video, pages from their home country etc. We want to make the click at once and not wait. It all takes longer now. </p>
<p>What about the users that use touch screens? What about the delay while waiting to load? Especially for people with slower Internet, Google is really killing it for them. The company has a User Experience department, why don&#8217;t they listen to the users? </p>
<p>For a search I would usually hit my homepage and without even looking I would immediately start typing, enter and there I am. Now I&#8217;m typing alright, but I find the search field catching on mid first or second keyword. It&#8217;s extremely annoying. I am hard pressed to find workarounds since Google ignores the wishes of its users and refuses to provide a disable option. If no workarounds work to my satisfaction I am sorry to say I will have to change my search engine for the first time in nearly a decade. How sad&#8230;</p>
<p>If it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s fade-in is what you want by Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/12/03/googles-fade-in-is-what-you-want/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=280#comment-71</guid>
		<description>@fredrik Good point. Firstly, we don&#039;t actually know if &quot;most users&quot; at google.com move their mouse to focus the search field, it is after all already in focus. Google&#039;s post makes no mention regarding this behavior. They do however mention that power users really do exhibit shorter time to first action without the surrounding links.

In the end, it&#039;s hard to speculate without the test data. I often feel envious of the kind of resources they have access to, especially traffic-wise, when it comes to multivariate testing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@fredrik Good point. Firstly, we don&#8217;t actually know if &#8220;most users&#8221; at google.com move their mouse to focus the search field, it is after all already in focus. Google&#8217;s post makes no mention regarding this behavior. They do however mention that power users really do exhibit shorter time to first action without the surrounding links.</p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s hard to speculate without the test data. I often feel envious of the kind of resources they have access to, especially traffic-wise, when it comes to multivariate testing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s fade-in is what you want by Fredrik Broman</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/12/03/googles-fade-in-is-what-you-want/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredrik Broman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=280#comment-70</guid>
		<description>So why do it at all then?  As i see it there will be three scenarios: Power users don&#039;t visit google.com, semi-power users who visit google.com just type a query and hit enter without touching the mouse, and the rest will move their mouse immediately when the page is loaded and could have just been served the full content right away. No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why do it at all then?  As i see it there will be three scenarios: Power users don&#8217;t visit google.com, semi-power users who visit google.com just type a query and hit enter without touching the mouse, and the rest will move their mouse immediately when the page is loaded and could have just been served the full content right away. No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s fade-in is what you want by Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/12/03/googles-fade-in-is-what-you-want/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=280#comment-69</guid>
		<description>@alex drewniak My initial reaction was along those line too. But when you take into account the hard data from Google&#039;s test, it&#039;s clear that it&#039;s not a problem.
Also, wouldn&#039;t moving your mouse immediately give (the uninitiated) user a feeling the rest of the interface just popped up a smidgeon later than the box, like an image loading?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@alex drewniak My initial reaction was along those line too. But when you take into account the hard data from Google&#8217;s test, it&#8217;s clear that it&#8217;s not a problem.<br />
Also, wouldn&#8217;t moving your mouse immediately give (the uninitiated) user a feeling the rest of the interface just popped up a smidgeon later than the box, like an image loading?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google&#8217;s fade-in is what you want by Alex Drewniak</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/12/03/googles-fade-in-is-what-you-want/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Drewniak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 12:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=280#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, sir. 

Thought about this a bit last night and realized that a majority of users that I&#039;ve observed (read average users) that come to Google to conduct a search tend use their mouse to highlight the input field. This behaviour seems to be deeply rooted and occurs regardless if the input field already is highlighted or not when the page in questions finishes loading. 

Having that in mind, the new approach to the Google start page could have a negative effect with user being distraced and end up wandering off somewhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, sir. </p>
<p>Thought about this a bit last night and realized that a majority of users that I&#8217;ve observed (read average users) that come to Google to conduct a search tend use their mouse to highlight the input field. This behaviour seems to be deeply rooted and occurs regardless if the input field already is highlighted or not when the page in questions finishes loading. </p>
<p>Having that in mind, the new approach to the Google start page could have a negative effect with user being distraced and end up wandering off somewhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Useful Augmented Reality by Anders</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/09/10/useful-augmented-reality/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=275#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Coolt, men räcker det inte med en linjal för att se om paketet passar?

/A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coolt, men räcker det inte med en linjal för att se om paketet passar?</p>
<p>/A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear Windows 7 &#8211; I&#8217;m a Switcher Still by Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to hear you&#039;ve figured out what you like. In the long run, that&#039;s all that matters!

Windows 7 is a cubicle?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to hear you&#8217;ve figured out what you like. In the long run, that&#8217;s all that matters!</p>
<p>Windows 7 is a cubicle?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear Windows 7 &#8211; I&#8217;m a Switcher Still by James</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>When you arrive in a new office with a fresh desk and a nice new chair, there&#039;s still an empty waste paper basket next to you waiting for some rubbish that you&#039;re inevitably going to write, ahem. How about using the OS before looking at the desktop and start menu and making a judgement? I use ubuntu, OS leopard and vista. Vista is the best of the three and i&#039;m looking forward to the rich new features 7 has to offer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you arrive in a new office with a fresh desk and a nice new chair, there&#8217;s still an empty waste paper basket next to you waiting for some rubbish that you&#8217;re inevitably going to write, ahem. How about using the OS before looking at the desktop and start menu and making a judgement? I use ubuntu, OS leopard and vista. Vista is the best of the three and i&#8217;m looking forward to the rich new features 7 has to offer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Attention Control is the Next Work Ethic by George Espinosa</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/01/15/attention-control-is-the-next-work-ethic/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>George Espinosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/attention-control-is-the-next-work-ethic/#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Excellent post!  I like to call it Digital ADD.  :-)  I predict that sometime in the future, there will be an Analog Revolution where we go back to just a few TV channels, text e-mails, and web pages no more complicated than Wikipedia.  Heck, maybe even rotary phones will make a comeback.  We&#039;re constantly bombarded with stimuli and we can only take so much.  Say yes to Mayberry and no to Blackberry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post!  I like to call it Digital ADD.  :-)  I predict that sometime in the future, there will be an Analog Revolution where we go back to just a few TV channels, text e-mails, and web pages no more complicated than Wikipedia.  Heck, maybe even rotary phones will make a comeback.  We&#8217;re constantly bombarded with stimuli and we can only take so much.  Say yes to Mayberry and no to Blackberry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear Windows 7 &#8211; I&#8217;m a Switcher Still by Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>@Peter - If you&#039;re going to clean the desktop, why not clean it completely? Now there&#039;s a trash can and nothing else - what do I need it for when there&#039;s nothing to throw in it? It&#039;s the single most prominent visual entity on my screen (apart from the very nice &quot;beta&quot; fish).

Here I was, thinking my &quot;question&quot; example was excellent, but I should perhaps have elaborated a bit more. Think about it - what would your answer to that question be? You don&#039;t even know what a &quot;Prolikate Gurb&quot; is, right? You&#039;re simply not qualified to to answer, and that&#039;s the where most users find themselves when confronted with those kinds of dialogs.

Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter &#8211; If you&#8217;re going to clean the desktop, why not clean it completely? Now there&#8217;s a trash can and nothing else &#8211; what do I need it for when there&#8217;s nothing to throw in it? It&#8217;s the single most prominent visual entity on my screen (apart from the very nice &#8220;beta&#8221; fish).</p>
<p>Here I was, thinking my &#8220;question&#8221; example was excellent, but I should perhaps have elaborated a bit more. Think about it &#8211; what would your answer to that question be? You don&#8217;t even know what a &#8220;Prolikate Gurb&#8221; is, right? You&#8217;re simply not qualified to to answer, and that&#8217;s the where most users find themselves when confronted with those kinds of dialogs.</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to share your thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear Windows 7 &#8211; I&#8217;m a Switcher Still by Peter Sunna</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Sunna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I really like the idea of an empty desktop since you always need to clean your desk to find the files you placed there (ie, minimize windows). If you compare to vista I can&#039;t agree that win7 is more cluttered. Looking at the desktop/start menu/taskbar that&#039;s for sure not the case and the new explorer is just so much cleaner. I hated the fact that everything was placed below desktop in vista. Now it&#039;s more like osx and the folder tree finally doesn&#039;t expand by default as well. I like the libraries and how they (hopefully) will be shared by other programs instead of each app having its own index for images, music, etc.

The information balloons could be, dare I say, less obtrusive by default though, for example when plugging in an ums. Important issues after install is funny indeed. Regarding antivirus I think there is a problem for ms to include it by default, but lots of oems will probably add that (and lots of other junk for that matter). 

The most crippling aspect would do better with an example...don&#039;t you think? My example of annoyance would be all prompts when downloading files from ie, but luckely for me I use chrome.

Btw, win + p is my favourite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the idea of an empty desktop since you always need to clean your desk to find the files you placed there (ie, minimize windows). If you compare to vista I can&#8217;t agree that win7 is more cluttered. Looking at the desktop/start menu/taskbar that&#8217;s for sure not the case and the new explorer is just so much cleaner. I hated the fact that everything was placed below desktop in vista. Now it&#8217;s more like osx and the folder tree finally doesn&#8217;t expand by default as well. I like the libraries and how they (hopefully) will be shared by other programs instead of each app having its own index for images, music, etc.</p>
<p>The information balloons could be, dare I say, less obtrusive by default though, for example when plugging in an ums. Important issues after install is funny indeed. Regarding antivirus I think there is a problem for ms to include it by default, but lots of oems will probably add that (and lots of other junk for that matter). </p>
<p>The most crippling aspect would do better with an example&#8230;don&#8217;t you think? My example of annoyance would be all prompts when downloading files from ie, but luckely for me I use chrome.</p>
<p>Btw, win + p is my favourite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dear Windows 7 &#8211; I&#8217;m a Switcher Still by Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.wordpress.com/2009/01/13/dear-windows-7-im-a-switcher-still/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Btw, Peter Sunna posted a link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.msdn.com/tims/archive/2009/01/12/the-bumper-list-of-windows-7-secrets.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some nice Windows 7 tips&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw, Peter Sunna posted a link to <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/tims/archive/2009/01/12/the-bumper-list-of-windows-7-secrets.aspx" rel="nofollow">some nice Windows 7 tips</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Green as the Decisive Factor by Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/12/29/green-as-the-decisive-factor/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=142#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Speaking of saving ourselves, Salon.com has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/books/review/2009/01/05/Mark_bittman/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;interview with Mark Bittman&lt;/a&gt;, author of &quot;Food Matters&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of saving ourselves, Salon.com has an <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/review/2009/01/05/Mark_bittman/" rel="nofollow">interview with Mark Bittman</a>, author of &#8220;Food Matters&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Umbraco 4, all shiny by Ruben Verborgh</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/12/18/umbraco-4-all-shiny/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben Verborgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 22:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=112#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Very good point.

These days, I&#039;m philosophizing about Umbraco 5, and one of the things I see is a separate development of UI and business logic. The examples you name are good, and I actually thought of both of them.

I think indeed we can take the lead here. I strongly believe in Niels&#039; capacities as a UI visionary.

But I won&#039;t talk too much about that... right now it&#039;s 4.0 and these thoughts are just mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point.</p>
<p>These days, I&#8217;m philosophizing about Umbraco 5, and one of the things I see is a separate development of UI and business logic. The examples you name are good, and I actually thought of both of them.</p>
<p>I think indeed we can take the lead here. I strongly believe in Niels&#8217; capacities as a UI visionary.</p>
<p>But I won&#8217;t talk too much about that&#8230; right now it&#8217;s 4.0 and these thoughts are just mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Generations by Sammi</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/12/20/generations/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Sammi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=127#comment-24</guid>
		<description>:)

Jag känner igen nästan varje sak Loe gör. Min 2,5 åriga son har samma beteende. Han tittar på film/tv via datorn. Han navigerar vant bland menyerna i iPhonen (snacka om användarvänlighet). Hans favorit är programmet Scribble där man kan rita på skärmen och sedan skaka telefonen för att börja om. Han älskar att titta på olika djur på Youtube och minns söktermerna som jag ska söka efter. Han brukar springa omkring med vår IXUS kamera och säga &quot;säg cheese&quot; innan han tar kort. Vi Skypar med morföräldrarna titt som tätt.

Internet har förändrat allt och inget blir sig likt. Jag undrar hur man kommer definiera stress framöver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:)</p>
<p>Jag känner igen nästan varje sak Loe gör. Min 2,5 åriga son har samma beteende. Han tittar på film/tv via datorn. Han navigerar vant bland menyerna i iPhonen (snacka om användarvänlighet). Hans favorit är programmet Scribble där man kan rita på skärmen och sedan skaka telefonen för att börja om. Han älskar att titta på olika djur på Youtube och minns söktermerna som jag ska söka efter. Han brukar springa omkring med vår IXUS kamera och säga &#8220;säg cheese&#8221; innan han tar kort. Vi Skypar med morföräldrarna titt som tätt.</p>
<p>Internet har förändrat allt och inget blir sig likt. Jag undrar hur man kommer definiera stress framöver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Umbraco 4, all shiny by Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/12/18/umbraco-4-all-shiny/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=112#comment-23</guid>
		<description>@hartvig  - Even with separate structures, being able to associate pages more strongly between language branches would be cool.

@ruben - Implementational model software is where the underlying technical implementation is directly represented in the GUI. E-mail software is a an excellent example of this - messages arrive chronologically, are stored as individual messages and displayed chronologically even though they are part of conversations. Umbraco is far from alone here, it&#039;s what goes for pretty much all publishing platforms. 

examples: 
*Separate fields etc for page content that is displayed uniformly

*To preview a post, you have to save it, then preview it.

* Umbracos url model relys on &quot;pages&quot; - If you run a blog and publish a blog post at 2008-12-30, you have to create structure pages &quot;2008&quot;, &quot;12&quot; and &quot;30&quot; in order have your post show up at /2008/12/30/this-post. (regardless of action handlers that do it for you). Comments are stored as individual pages underneath each page etc.

I&#039;m not saying leaving the classic implementational model behind is easy. But I&#039;d love to see the Umbraco-team take the lead. Canvas is a good start! 

----

Thanks for your feedback!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hartvig  &#8211; Even with separate structures, being able to associate pages more strongly between language branches would be cool.</p>
<p>@ruben &#8211; Implementational model software is where the underlying technical implementation is directly represented in the GUI. E-mail software is a an excellent example of this &#8211; messages arrive chronologically, are stored as individual messages and displayed chronologically even though they are part of conversations. Umbraco is far from alone here, it&#8217;s what goes for pretty much all publishing platforms. </p>
<p>examples:<br />
*Separate fields etc for page content that is displayed uniformly</p>
<p>*To preview a post, you have to save it, then preview it.</p>
<p>* Umbracos url model relys on &#8220;pages&#8221; &#8211; If you run a blog and publish a blog post at 2008-12-30, you have to create structure pages &#8220;2008&#8243;, &#8220;12&#8243; and &#8220;30&#8243; in order have your post show up at /2008/12/30/this-post. (regardless of action handlers that do it for you). Comments are stored as individual pages underneath each page etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying leaving the classic implementational model behind is easy. But I&#8217;d love to see the Umbraco-team take the lead. Canvas is a good start! </p>
<p>&#8212;-</p>
<p>Thanks for your feedback!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Umbraco 4, all shiny by Ruben Verborgh</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/12/18/umbraco-4-all-shiny/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruben Verborgh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2008 23:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=112#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Great feedback indeed.

Could you clarify &quot;a goodbye to the implementational model for even better editorial usability&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great feedback indeed.</p>
<p>Could you clarify &#8220;a goodbye to the implementational model for even better editorial usability&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Umbraco 4, all shiny by Hartvig</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/12/18/umbraco-4-all-shiny/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Hartvig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 10:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=112#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Great feedback!

We&#039;ll never have the multi-lingual support you&#039;re asking for. Our research shows that almost no multi-lingual sites are 1:1 translated but often represent different markets and culture, which means different product portfolios, marketing angles and legislation. In a very few and rare cases 1:1 make sense and there are other products that excels for that. One of the things that makes Umbraco great is the courage to be a product that doesn&#039;t try to do it all.

Better media management is a big wish though and something we&#039;ll work on next.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great feedback!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll never have the multi-lingual support you&#8217;re asking for. Our research shows that almost no multi-lingual sites are 1:1 translated but often represent different markets and culture, which means different product portfolios, marketing angles and legislation. In a very few and rare cases 1:1 make sense and there are other products that excels for that. One of the things that makes Umbraco great is the courage to be a product that doesn&#8217;t try to do it all.</p>
<p>Better media management is a big wish though and something we&#8217;ll work on next.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forlaggare.se Refresh by Umbraco 4, all shiny &#171; Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/10/19/forlaggarese-refresh/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Umbraco 4, all shiny &#171; Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] v4 is great. It&#8217;s not, however, the hallmark event that I was hoping for. Among other things, I feel it&#8217;s lacking integrated multilanguage [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] v4 is great. It&#8217;s not, however, the hallmark event that I was hoping for. Among other things, I feel it&#8217;s lacking integrated multilanguage [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on I Want my Package Now, Right Now by Nice and Accurate Predictions &#171; Jonas Bohlin</title>
		<link>http://jonasbohlin.net/2008/12/09/i-want-my-package-now-right-now/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Nice and Accurate Predictions &#171; Jonas Bohlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jonasbohlin.net/?p=84#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] to do&#8230; I sort of sneak-started  talking about it a couple of days ago while ranting about shipping. The gist of that post was; Online retailers that do their homework set up a kick-ass logistics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to do&#8230; I sort of sneak-started  talking about it a couple of days ago while ranting about shipping. The gist of that post was; Online retailers that do their homework set up a kick-ass logistics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
